Kakamega vs Lamu Cost of Living Comparison

Executive summary: Lamu leads on CPI (17.8 vs 18.1, NYC=100), Lamu leads on rent index, and Kakamega leads on purchasing power. Validate neighbourhood rents before relocating — city-wide winners can reverse at district scale.

Overall Cost Winner

Lamu

Lower overall CPI; largest measurable gaps: Housing (5% gap, Lamu ahead); Utilities (5% gap, Lamu ahead).

Monthly Cost Difference

Estimated monthly housing+utilities+internet basket is about $12 lower in Lamu than in Kakamega (~5% gap; converted via exchange rates).

Estimated monthly difference: $12 (favoring Lamu).

Category Winners

CategoryWinnerNote
Overall CPILamuCPI 17.8 vs 18.1 (lower is better)
HousingLamuRent index 5.8 vs 6.1 (lower is better)
FoodLamuGroceries index 25.2 vs 25.8 (lower is better)
TransportLamuOne-way ticket 38.16 vs 39.28 (lower is better)
UtilitiesLamuUtilities (85m²) 1496.4 vs 1573.8 (lower is better)
InternetLamuInternet 2266.53 vs 2320.71 (lower is better)
RestaurantsKakamegaRestaurant index 15.6 vs 15.6 (lower is better)
SalaryKakamegaAvg net salary 119170.2 vs 113571.6 (higher is better)
Purchasing PowerKakamegaPP index 14.9 vs 14.2 (higher is better)

Biggest Difference

Housing: Lamu leads with a 5% gap.

Rent index 5.8 vs 6.1 (lower is better)

Quick Decision

  • Students: Lamu — Lower housing / rent index (5% gap).
  • Families: Lamu — Housing is typically the largest household line; rent index favors Lamu; purchasing power favors Kakamega.
  • Remote Workers: Lamu — Everyday cost index (CPI) favors Lamu (~2% gap).
  • Budget Living: Lamu — Lowest overall consumer-price index in this pair.

Key Takeaways

  • Lamu is the overall cost winner on CPI (~2% lower everyday-cost index than Kakamega).
  • Housing: Lamu leads on rent index (5% gap).
  • Food / groceries: Lamu is lower (2% gap).
  • Purchasing power: Kakamega scores higher (5% gap).
  • Sample monthly basket (1BR + utilities + internet) is ~$12 cheaper in Lamu.

Analysis

Detailed breakdown uses only paired indices: CPI 18.1/17.8, rent 6.1/5.8, purchasing power 14.9/14.2. Category winners can diverge — a city may win rent while losing CPI. No GDP, climate, or industry claims are invented for either city.

City pages

  • Kakamega, Kakamega
  • Lamu, Lamu

Country pages

  • Kenya

Related comparisons

  • Nairobi vs Kakamega
  • Nairobi vs Lamu
  • Baringo vs Kakamega
  • Baringo vs Lamu
  • Bungoma vs Kakamega
  • Bungoma vs Lamu
  • Busia vs Kakamega
  • Embu vs Kakamega
  • Embu vs Lamu
  • Garissa vs Kakamega

Nearby city comparisons

  • Garissa vs Lamu
  • Homa Bay vs Kakamega
  • Homa Bay vs Lamu
  • Isiolo vs Kakamega
  • Isiolo vs Lamu
  • Kajiado vs Kakamega
  • Kajiado vs Lamu
  • Kakamega vs Kericho

More expensive alternatives

  • Kakamega vs Kiambu
  • Kakamega vs Kitui
  • Kericho vs Lamu
  • Kiambu vs Lamu
  • Kitui vs Lamu

Trust & data transparency

Last updated: 2026-08-21

Data Sources

This page uses CityCost index inputs. Platform sources (see also Data sources):

  • Regional
  • Regional

On-page labels for this view: Regional · Regional.

Methodology

Each indexed city is associated with a reference basket of common living costs (for example rent, groceries samples, transport tickets, utilities, restaurant meals, and net salary where available). From those items, the platform derives relative indices such as CPI, rent, groceries, restaurants, and local purchasing power, using New York City = 100 as the familiar baseline convention for relative comparison.

Read full methodology · Data sources · Disclaimer

Explore CityCost

  • Methodology
  • Data sources
  • Cost of living calculator