Kyoto vs Marrakesh Cost of Living Comparison
Takeaway for Kyoto vs Marrakesh: everyday costs favor Marrakesh (~58% CPI gap), housing index favors Marrakesh, wage stretch favors Kyoto. Use category winners, not a single headline, when the binding constraint is rent or income.
Overall Cost Winner
Marrakesh
Lower overall CPI; largest measurable gaps: Transport (98% gap, Marrakesh ahead); Internet (98% gap, Marrakesh ahead).
Monthly Cost Difference
Estimated monthly housing+utilities+internet basket is about $257 lower in Marrakesh than in Kyoto (~56% gap; converted via exchange rates).
Estimated monthly difference: $257 (favoring Marrakesh).
Category Winners
| Category | Winner | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Overall CPI | Marrakesh | CPI 17 vs 40.8 (lower is better) |
| Housing | Marrakesh | Rent index 5.1 vs 11.3 (lower is better) |
| Food | Marrakesh | Groceries index 24.6 vs 50.8 (lower is better) |
| Transport | Marrakesh | One-way ticket 2.67 vs 148.94 (lower is better) |
| Utilities | Marrakesh | Utilities (85m²) 100.98 vs 3627.3 (lower is better) |
| Internet | Marrakesh | Internet 157.31 vs 7021.88 (lower is better) |
| Restaurants | Marrakesh | Restaurant index 14.1 vs 21.5 (lower is better) |
| Salary | Kyoto | Avg net salary 559246.2 vs 9145.62 (higher is better) |
| Purchasing Power | Kyoto | PP index 56.2 vs 14.9 (higher is better) |
Biggest Difference
Transport: Marrakesh leads with a 98% gap.
One-way ticket 2.67 vs 148.94 (lower is better)
Quick Decision
- Students: Marrakesh — Lower housing / rent index (55% gap).
- Families: Marrakesh — Housing is typically the largest household line; rent index favors Marrakesh; purchasing power favors Kyoto.
- Remote Workers: Marrakesh — Everyday cost index (CPI) favors Marrakesh (~58% gap).
- Budget Living: Marrakesh — Lowest overall consumer-price index in this pair.
Key Takeaways
- Marrakesh is the overall cost winner on CPI (~58% lower everyday-cost index than Kyoto).
- Housing: Marrakesh leads on rent index (55% gap).
- Food / groceries: Marrakesh is lower (52% gap).
- Purchasing power: Kyoto scores higher (73% gap).
- Largest category gap: Transport (98%), favoring Marrakesh.
- Sample monthly basket (1BR + utilities + internet) is ~$257 cheaper in Marrakesh.
Analysis
Kyoto versus Marrakesh is not a single number. With a 58% CPI spread, groceries and services tend to move with Marrakesh, while housing follows Marrakesh's rent index. Purchasing power (56.2 vs 14.9) decides whether local wages offset local prices.
Trust & data transparency
Last updated: 2026-08-21
Data Sources
This page uses CityCost index inputs. Platform sources (see also Data sources):
- Nearby
- Regional
On-page labels for this view: Nearby · Regional.
Methodology
Each indexed city is associated with a reference basket of common living costs (for example rent, groceries samples, transport tickets, utilities, restaurant meals, and net salary where available). From those items, the platform derives relative indices such as CPI, rent, groceries, restaurants, and local purchasing power, using New York City = 100 as the familiar baseline convention for relative comparison.