Los Ángeles vs Coquimbo Cost of Living Comparison

Executive summary: Coquimbo leads on CPI (24.1 vs 42.5, NYC=100), Coquimbo leads on rent index, and Los Ángeles leads on purchasing power. Validate neighbourhood rents before relocating — city-wide winners can reverse at district scale.

Overall Cost Winner

Coquimbo

Lower overall CPI; largest measurable gaps: Housing (71% gap, Coquimbo ahead); Utilities (71% gap, Coquimbo ahead).

Monthly Cost Difference

Estimated monthly housing+utilities+internet basket is about $644 lower in Coquimbo than in Los Ángeles (~69% gap; converted via exchange rates).

Estimated monthly difference: $644 (favoring Coquimbo).

Category Winners

CategoryWinnerNote
Overall CPICoquimboCPI 24.1 vs 42.5 (lower is better)
HousingCoquimboRent index 7.1 vs 24.3 (lower is better)
FoodCoquimboGroceries index 31.8 vs 45 (lower is better)
TransportCoquimboOne-way ticket 391.21 vs 730.07 (lower is better)
UtilitiesCoquimboUtilities (85m²) 13490 vs 46170 (lower is better)
InternetCoquimboInternet 22477 vs 29393 (lower is better)
RestaurantsCoquimboRestaurant index 21 vs 47.9 (lower is better)
SalaryLos ÁngelesAvg net salary 3392640 vs 1537290 (higher is better)
Purchasing PowerLos ÁngelesPP index 57.6 vs 26.1 (higher is better)

Biggest Difference

Housing: Coquimbo leads with a 71% gap.

Rent index 7.1 vs 24.3 (lower is better)

Quick Decision

  • Students: Coquimbo — Lower housing / rent index (71% gap).
  • Families: Coquimbo — Housing is typically the largest household line; rent index favors Coquimbo; purchasing power favors Los Ángeles.
  • Remote Workers: Coquimbo — Everyday cost index (CPI) favors Coquimbo (~43% gap).
  • Budget Living: Coquimbo — Lowest overall consumer-price index in this pair.

Key Takeaways

  • Coquimbo is the overall cost winner on CPI (~43% lower everyday-cost index than Los Ángeles).
  • Housing: Coquimbo leads on rent index (71% gap).
  • Food / groceries: Coquimbo is lower (29% gap).
  • Purchasing power: Los Ángeles scores higher (55% gap).
  • Sample monthly basket (1BR + utilities + internet) is ~$644 cheaper in Coquimbo.

Analysis

Detailed breakdown uses only paired indices: CPI 42.5/24.1, rent 24.3/7.1, purchasing power 57.6/26.1. Category winners can diverge — a city may win rent while losing CPI. No GDP, climate, or industry claims are invented for either city.

City pages

  • Los Ángeles, Biobío
  • Coquimbo, Coquimbo

Country pages

  • Chile

Related comparisons

  • Barcelona vs Los Ángeles
  • Los Ángeles vs Barcelona
  • Santiago vs Los Ángeles
  • Dakar vs Los Ángeles
  • Dodoma vs Los Ángeles
  • Los Ángeles vs Brussels
  • Los Ángeles vs Sarajevo
  • Los Ángeles vs Tirana
  • Los Ángeles vs Buenos Aires
  • Ankara vs Los Ángeles

Nearby city comparisons

  • Ashgabat vs Los Ángeles
  • Khartoum vs Los Ángeles
  • Kyiv vs Los Ángeles
  • Moscow vs Los Ángeles
  • Riyadh vs Los Ángeles
  • Taipei vs Los Ángeles
  • Tashkent vs Los Ángeles
  • Manchester vs Los Ángeles

Cheaper alternatives

  • Los Ángeles vs Antofagasta
  • Antofagasta vs Coquimbo

Trust & data transparency

Last updated: 2026-08-20

Data Sources

This page uses CityCost index inputs. Platform sources (see also Data sources):

  • Regional
  • Regional

On-page labels for this view: Regional · Regional.

Methodology

Each indexed city is associated with a reference basket of common living costs (for example rent, groceries samples, transport tickets, utilities, restaurant meals, and net salary where available). From those items, the platform derives relative indices such as CPI, rent, groceries, restaurants, and local purchasing power, using New York City = 100 as the familiar baseline convention for relative comparison.

Read full methodology · Data sources · Disclaimer

Explore CityCost

  • Methodology
  • Data sources
  • Cost of living calculator