Sydney vs Rome Cost of Living Comparison

Executive summary: Rome leads on CPI (62.6 vs 78, NYC=100), Rome leads on rent index, and Sydney leads on purchasing power. Validate neighbourhood rents before relocating — city-wide winners can reverse at district scale.

Overall Cost Winner

Rome

Lower overall CPI; largest measurable gaps: Utilities (71% gap, Rome ahead); Transport (58% gap, Rome ahead).

Monthly Cost Difference

Estimated monthly housing+utilities+internet basket is about $1,202 lower in Rome than in Sydney (~51% gap; converted via exchange rates).

Estimated monthly difference: $1,202 (favoring Rome).

Category Winners

CategoryWinnerNote
Overall CPIRomeCPI 62.6 vs 78 (lower is better)
HousingRomeRent index 29.5 vs 62 (lower is better)
FoodRomeGroceries index 62.6 vs 80 (lower is better)
TransportRomeOne-way ticket 1.3 vs 3.07 (lower is better)
UtilitiesRomeUtilities (85m²) 54.28 vs 187.24 (lower is better)
InternetRomeInternet 55.64 vs 89.84 (lower is better)
RestaurantsRomeRestaurant index 58 vs 75 (lower is better)
SalarySydneyAvg net salary 10298.2 vs 4471.94 (higher is better)
Purchasing PowerSydneyPP index 110 vs 78.4 (higher is better)

Biggest Difference

Utilities: Rome leads with a 71% gap.

Utilities (85m²) 54.28 vs 187.24 (lower is better)

Quick Decision

  • Students: Rome — Lower housing / rent index (52% gap).
  • Families: Rome — Housing is typically the largest household line; rent index favors Rome; purchasing power favors Sydney.
  • Remote Workers: Rome — Everyday cost index (CPI) favors Rome (~20% gap).
  • Budget Living: Rome — Lowest overall consumer-price index in this pair.

Key Takeaways

  • Rome is the overall cost winner on CPI (~20% lower everyday-cost index than Sydney).
  • Housing: Rome leads on rent index (52% gap).
  • Food / groceries: Rome is lower (22% gap).
  • Purchasing power: Sydney scores higher (29% gap).
  • Largest category gap: Utilities (71%), favoring Rome.
  • Sample monthly basket (1BR + utilities + internet) is ~$1,202 cheaper in Rome.

Analysis

Detailed breakdown uses only paired indices: CPI 78/62.6, rent 62/29.5, purchasing power 110/78.4. Category winners can diverge — a city may win rent while losing CPI. No GDP, climate, or industry claims are invented for either city.

City pages

  • Sydney, New South Wales
  • Rome, Lazio

Country pages

  • Australia
  • Italy

Related comparisons

  • Abu Dhabi vs Rome
  • Abu Dhabi vs Sydney
  • Ajmer vs Rome
  • Bangalore vs Rome
  • Bangalore vs Sydney
  • Bangkok vs Rome
  • Bengaluru vs Rome
  • Bengaluru vs Sydney
  • Berlin vs Rome
  • Berlin vs Sydney

Nearby city comparisons

  • Melbourne vs Rome
  • Sydney vs Canberra
  • Sydney vs Melbourne
  • Sydney vs Miami
  • Sydney vs Gold Coast
  • Sydney vs Queenstown
  • Rome vs Agra
  • Rome vs Florence

Cheaper alternatives

  • Rome vs Molise
  • Rome vs Venice
  • Rome vs Milan

Trust & data transparency

Last updated: 2026-08-21

Data Sources

This page uses CityCost index inputs. Platform sources (see also Data sources):

  • Real
  • Regional

On-page labels for this view: Real · Regional.

Methodology

Each indexed city is associated with a reference basket of common living costs (for example rent, groceries samples, transport tickets, utilities, restaurant meals, and net salary where available). From those items, the platform derives relative indices such as CPI, rent, groceries, restaurants, and local purchasing power, using New York City = 100 as the familiar baseline convention for relative comparison.

Read full methodology · Data sources · Disclaimer

Explore CityCost

  • Methodology
  • Data sources
  • Cost of living calculator