Khartoum vs Rio de Janeiro Cost of Living Comparison
Takeaway for Khartoum vs Rio de Janeiro: everyday costs favor Khartoum (~20% CPI gap), housing index favors Rio de Janeiro, wage stretch favors Rio de Janeiro. Use category winners, not a single headline, when the binding constraint is rent or income.
Overall Cost Winner
Khartoum
Lower overall CPI; largest measurable gaps: Transport (99% gap, Rio de Janeiro ahead); Utilities (99% gap, Rio de Janeiro ahead).
Monthly Cost Difference
Estimated monthly housing+utilities+internet basket is about $141 lower in Rio de Janeiro than in Khartoum (~35% gap; converted via exchange rates).
Estimated monthly difference: $141 (favoring Rio de Janeiro).
Category Winners
| Category | Winner | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Overall CPI | Khartoum | CPI 18.1 vs 21.8 (lower is better) |
| Housing | Rio de Janeiro | Rent index 6.5 vs 10.6 (lower is better) |
| Food | Rio de Janeiro | Groceries index 27.2 vs 28.1 (lower is better) |
| Transport | Rio de Janeiro | One-way ticket 1.94 vs 187.92 (lower is better) |
| Utilities | Rio de Janeiro | Utilities (85m²) 70.2 vs 12720 (lower is better) |
| Internet | Rio de Janeiro | Internet 129.65 vs 8148 (lower is better) |
| Restaurants | Khartoum | Restaurant index 18 vs 18 (lower is better) |
| Salary | Khartoum | Avg net salary 498480 vs 8503.92 (higher is better) |
| Purchasing Power | Rio de Janeiro | PP index 25.4 vs 13.4 (higher is better) |
Biggest Difference
Transport: Rio de Janeiro leads with a 99% gap.
One-way ticket 1.94 vs 187.92 (lower is better)
Quick Decision
- Students: Rio de Janeiro — Lower housing / rent index (39% gap).
- Families: Rio de Janeiro — Housing is typically the largest household line; rent index favors Rio de Janeiro; purchasing power favors Rio de Janeiro.
- Remote Workers: Khartoum — Everyday cost index (CPI) favors Khartoum (~20% gap).
- Budget Living: Khartoum — Lowest overall consumer-price index in this pair.
Key Takeaways
- Khartoum is the overall cost winner on CPI (~20% lower everyday-cost index than Rio de Janeiro).
- Housing: Rio de Janeiro leads on rent index (39% gap).
- Food / groceries: Rio de Janeiro is lower (3% gap).
- Purchasing power: Rio de Janeiro scores higher (90% gap).
- Largest category gap: Transport (99%), favoring Rio de Janeiro.
- Sample monthly basket (1BR + utilities + internet) is ~$141 cheaper in Rio de Janeiro.
Analysis
Khartoum versus Rio de Janeiro is not a single number. With a 20% CPI spread, groceries and services tend to move with Khartoum, while housing follows Rio de Janeiro's rent index. Purchasing power (13.4 vs 25.4) decides whether local wages offset local prices.
Trust & data transparency
Last updated: 2026-08-20
Data Sources
This page uses CityCost index inputs. Platform sources (see also Data sources):
- Regional
- Regional
On-page labels for this view: Regional · Regional.
Methodology
Each indexed city is associated with a reference basket of common living costs (for example rent, groceries samples, transport tickets, utilities, restaurant meals, and net salary where available). From those items, the platform derives relative indices such as CPI, rent, groceries, restaurants, and local purchasing power, using New York City = 100 as the familiar baseline convention for relative comparison.