Rio de Janeiro vs Amapá Cost of Living Comparison

Executive summary: Amapá leads on CPI (20 vs 21.8, NYC=100), Amapá leads on rent index, and Rio de Janeiro leads on purchasing power. Validate neighbourhood rents before relocating — city-wide winners can reverse at district scale.

Overall Cost Winner

Amapá

Lower overall CPI; largest measurable gaps: Housing (18% gap, Amapá ahead); Utilities (18% gap, Amapá ahead).

Monthly Cost Difference

Estimated monthly housing+utilities+internet basket is about $47 lower in Amapá than in Rio de Janeiro (~18% gap; converted via exchange rates).

Estimated monthly difference: $47 (favoring Amapá).

Category Winners

CategoryWinnerNote
Overall CPIAmapáCPI 20 vs 21.8 (lower is better)
HousingAmapáRent index 5.3 vs 6.5 (lower is better)
FoodAmapáGroceries index 24.2 vs 27.2 (lower is better)
TransportAmapáOne-way ticket 1.74 vs 1.94 (lower is better)
UtilitiesAmapáUtilities (85m²) 57.24 vs 70.2 (lower is better)
InternetAmapáInternet 115.67 vs 129.65 (lower is better)
RestaurantsAmapáRestaurant index 16.8 vs 18 (lower is better)
SalaryRio de JaneiroAvg net salary 8503.92 vs 6997.32 (higher is better)
Purchasing PowerRio de JaneiroPP index 25.4 vs 20.9 (higher is better)

Biggest Difference

Housing: Amapá leads with a 18% gap.

Rent index 5.3 vs 6.5 (lower is better)

Quick Decision

  • Students: Amapá — Lower housing / rent index (18% gap).
  • Families: Amapá — Housing is typically the largest household line; rent index favors Amapá; purchasing power favors Rio de Janeiro.
  • Remote Workers: Amapá — Everyday cost index (CPI) favors Amapá (~8% gap).
  • Budget Living: Amapá — Lowest overall consumer-price index in this pair.

Key Takeaways

  • Amapá is the overall cost winner on CPI (~8% lower everyday-cost index than Rio de Janeiro).
  • Housing: Amapá leads on rent index (18% gap).
  • Food / groceries: Amapá is lower (11% gap).
  • Purchasing power: Rio de Janeiro scores higher (18% gap).
  • Sample monthly basket (1BR + utilities + internet) is ~$47 cheaper in Amapá.

Analysis

Detailed breakdown uses only paired indices: CPI 21.8/20, rent 6.5/5.3, purchasing power 25.4/20.9. Category winners can diverge — a city may win rent while losing CPI. No GDP, climate, or industry claims are invented for either city.

City pages

  • Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro
  • Amapá, Amapá

Country pages

  • Brazil

Related comparisons

  • Rio de Janeiro vs Boston
  • Rio de Janeiro vs Barcelona
  • Manchester vs Rio de Janeiro
  • Rio de Janeiro vs Los Ángeles
  • Rio de Janeiro vs Milan
  • Rio de Janeiro vs San Francisco
  • San Francisco vs Rio de Janeiro
  • Amapá vs Vancouver
  • Ankara vs Rio de Janeiro
  • Bucharest vs Rio de Janeiro

Nearby city comparisons

  • Buffalo vs Rio de Janeiro
  • Dakar vs Rio de Janeiro
  • Dodoma vs Rio de Janeiro
  • Khartoum vs Rio de Janeiro
  • Kyiv vs Rio de Janeiro
  • Moscow vs Rio de Janeiro
  • Rio de Janeiro vs Shanghai
  • Riyadh vs Rio de Janeiro

Trust & data transparency

Last updated: 2026-08-25

Data Sources

This page uses CityCost index inputs. Platform sources (see also Data sources):

  • Regional
  • Regional

On-page labels for this view: Regional · Regional.

Methodology

Each indexed city is associated with a reference basket of common living costs (for example rent, groceries samples, transport tickets, utilities, restaurant meals, and net salary where available). From those items, the platform derives relative indices such as CPI, rent, groceries, restaurants, and local purchasing power, using New York City = 100 as the familiar baseline convention for relative comparison.

Read full methodology · Data sources · Disclaimer

Explore CityCost

  • Methodology
  • Data sources
  • Cost of living calculator